As casino entertainment expands, experts begin realising that the problem participation framework has always been underdeveloped and not funded enough. Today, with even more activities on the board, it has started to show some cracks in this landscape.
This is a real opportunity for all the stakeholders and all gambling market participants to think about how to improve that journey and experience a little bit more.
Modern tools for creating a healthy participation environment are abundant:
Exclusion lists | Casino venues offer dedicated programs that allow users to ban voluntarily themselves from gambling activities for a specified period |
Deposit and betting limits | Casinos often allow players to set daily, weekly, or monthly boundaries on their wagers and account replenishments to control spending and avoid chasing losses |
Reality checks | Operators may implement pop-up notifications that remind players about the time spent gambling and the amount of money wagered. This helps punters stay aware of their interactive behaviour |
Cooling-off periods | Casinos present temporary restrictions on access to allow players to take a break from gambling for a short period, typically 24 to 48 hours |
Access to responsible participation guides | Operators provide educational materials, dedicated helplines, and support of organisations to assist players who may be developing obsession problems |
Age and identity verification | Strict authorisation measures are in place to prevent underage gambling and ensure the legality of players on the portal |
With the presence of such instruments for responsible gambling adherence, it may seem that the situation is getting better, but this strategy is not ideal. Due to multiple imposed regulations, problem participation programs are not consumer-friendly. They are jurisdictional specific or company oriented or state-based — there is hardly any harmony in their coexistence.
A lot of experts believe that technological improvements can help with this concern. At the same time, they consider it value-neutral for land-based and online directions. Both spheres try to find a balance between revenue maximisation and harm minimisation if such standards are specified in regulations or at least within organisational norms.
In the United States, for example, Caesars uses self-exclusion technology across all their properties. There are no standards that specify the necessity to do this in the jurisdiction, but the brand focuses on responsible participation and earns its credit with the audience.
Yes, its competitors will earn on someone that Caesars excludes nationwide. The company will also invest millions of dollars in this endeavour. The lack of harmonisation of standards is currently the biggest challenge that collaboration can resolve.
The situation with iGaming direction is generally a bit more unique. The lack of physical borders and easy access to different jurisdictions allow players to quickly change their entertainment destination if they do not find something comfortable.
That is why the challenge of being responsive to the market concerns operators and local regulators the most. Better cooperation and harmonisation of all links in the chain would solve this problem and streamline operations for all market participants.
From the point of view of how all these regulations appear, a lot of research is conducted. However, raw results are not ready to be implemented in any type of change until all academic theory is translated into relevant notions.
And those also have to go into practice in numerous different ways because there are so many unique collaborators and stakeholders in the landscape. The way that this is translated to policy change from a government perspective is very different from changes at a corporate level and even more distinct from a public health perspective.
When experts differentiate, for example, the problem gambling and the need to access help and treatment versus the more responsible participation, it is necessary to focus additionally on the prevention efforts that exist here.
Responsible gambling market research is the most important factor for operators who enter the new working zone or adapt to innovative legal decrees. At the same time, not only managers are eager to find out about the state of the zone.
Importance of market research on responsible participation for regulators:
Relevance of market research for gambling project managers:
Stakeholders’ point of view on the significance of market research:
If there is an open line of communication between legal entities and managers to have conversations on delivering safer gaming initiatives effectively, that is a great starting point.
With this in mind, there are also opposite scenarios within the area:
Balancing is always difficult for legal entities. The crucial aspect is that it is integral to treat all of them the same. The presence of responsive and willing operators and bad actors has always been a reality. So, unless regulators write it in black and white rules, they cannot take action on working permits. In this case, imposing requirements is a beneficial strategy, though, can be seen by some market participants as a bit aggressive.
From a willing operator’s standpoint, they have good intentions to help people who need their assistance in case of obsession problems. First and foremost, it is managers’ priority to follow regulations that are set in place. But once operators want to stand out, they go above and beyond the regulations. And if they do it, there will be challenges.
Regulators are happy to hear operators like to go above and beyond. The platform managers want to do this but will probably experience challenges, so it is integral to mention what obstacles might await them.
The intentions of willing operators enhance consumer participation and positive play promotion. But without proper aid from regulators, with no relevant feedback, collaboration is impossible.
A common question asked by operators and regulators is about the most effective tool to guarantee a healthy participation environment. The answer here may be incredibly annoying for many — it depends.
What might work today may not be relevant in a few weeks (for example, mandatory self-limits). The only aspect here that is certain implies that the unified collaboration of all market participants will result in a more efficient working environment and healthy amusement activities for players.
The prerequisites for a strong partnership between operators, researchers, regulators, and stakeholders are as follows:
Be careful! We noticed that cybercriminals are using the Skype account live:twowinpower to deceive our customers.
For security reasons, please enter only contact details published on the page https://2wpower.com/en/feedback
Our company is not responsible for the actions of persons using Skype live:twowinpower.