African gambling regulation is not complicated by default, but Kenya is one of the markets that has put real weight behind enforcement, taxation, and technical supervision. This is not a jurisdiction for operators who plan to sit in a grey zone or test compliance through loopholes. If you expect to set up a gambling business in the country, be ready to work hard and reap solid benefits.
2WinPower prepared a practical guide to Kenya’s licensing reality. Our experts cover the legal basis, the regulator, the online permit types, the cost structure, and the compliance traps that shut down platforms. This way, our clients can be completely sure of the latest nuances of the jurisdiction's legal framework.

Kenya’s regulatory framework has recently gone through a hard reset. The old system under the Betting, Lotteries and Gaming Act (Cap. 131) has been replaced by the Gambling Control Act (Act No. 14 of 2025). The new statute was approved on 7 August 2025, published on 12 August, and enacted on 26 August.
A key practical point lies in the transition rules. Licences issued under the repealed law remain valid until expiry, after which the holder must apply under the new regime.
The central supervisor is the Gambling Regulatory Authority created under the 2025 Act, with a mandate that explicitly includes cooperation with the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) to establish a monitoring system for tax compliance.
The same law also builds “hands-on” oversight into the model. Inspectors can enter and check premises, seize documents or equipment, and offences by corporate bodies can attach to people in control unless they prove they took reasonable steps to prevent breaches.
Most iGaming entrepreneurs treat retail regulation as someone else’s problem. In Kenya, that approach backfires because the system is designed to link licences, permits, inspections, and tax control into one chain.
Why brick-and-mortar rules matter for iGaming operators:
Even if you plan to run solely online, you still need to budget for local operational presence and the expectations of supervision.
Kenya’s 2025 Act creates a distinct section for remote activities, with obligatory licence categories and technical control rules.
The statute lists 3 clear authorisations for online operation for:
That categorisation matters because it pushes operators into defined boxes. If your product combines a sportsbook, an RNG casino, and promotional draws, you should carefully plan the scope of licensing.
The law defines the transaction window in a way that affects reporting logic. It starts when a player deposits funds into the gaming account and ends when they withdraw money. This wording aligns neatly with Kenya’s move towards wallet-flow taxation, where levies attach at deposit and withdrawal points rather than only at bet settlement.
A Kenyan iGaming legal model expects a working technical architecture that the Authority can monitor. The key condition is a ratified gambling control system. A remote operator must run online activity under that framework, and the Authority should not approve it unless it covers specific requirements.
The law lists the minimum pillars the system must provide:
Failure to comply with the approved system can lead to revocation and an offence. The statute instructs the Authority to establish a framework for real-time monitoring of casinos and online gambling, with access for the Communications Authority of Kenya and other government agencies.
An operator must also provide technical details that enable oversight, including server locations, registration and deregistration mechanisms, and platform access points. If the product is smartphone-based, the law goes further and requires network connectivity particulars with two links to mobile operators.

Kenya is expensive for online brands, even if the core software stack is not premium. Budgeting must start with statutory security because the 2025 law explicitly sets these amounts.
Numbers installed by authorities:
Such a high entry barrier reshapes who can realistically hold a remote permit and weaves away unscrupulous businesses and low-funded brands.
Because licences issued under the old law remain valid until expiry, the legacy schedule still matters for financial planning and comparisons.
Common bookmaker licensing deductions comprise $3,500 plus $4,000 for a foreign brand. For casino-style activity, older public gaming instalments are reported at a much higher level. Under the 2025 Act, fees are expected to be set via regulations, so operators should treat these older charges as a baseline reference.
Kenya also puts minimum stake rules directly into the statute. A single bet in a casino machine and web gambling must be played for a minimum of KES 20.
All things considered, there is also a penalty for rule violation. A breach of the online minimum can trigger a fine of at least $23,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years.
Kenya’s gambling charges have been adjusted through the Finance Act 2025 changes and a wallet-flow logic that taxes deposit and withdrawal activity.
Practical structure to budget for:
If your business model assumes flexible taxation or slow enforcement, Kenya will punish that assumption.
The paperwork for a remote certificate is heavy, and the Authority expects readiness. Operators here have a typical build-out path to follow under Kenya’s current legal reality.
First of all, the law requires an application in the prescribed form, accompanied by the fees, evidence of gambling capital, and security in the form of an insurance bond or bank guarantee.
Next, it is critical to follow an operational sequence:
If the Authority refuses a grant or renewal, it is possible to appeal within 21 days.
Many failures in Kenya come from poor planning, weak technical governance, or sloppy marketing. The law hardwires consumer protection, monitoring, and enforcement into day-to-day operations, so even a strong platform can end up non-compliant by accident.
The most common traps:
Also, the Act gives inspectors strong powers to enter, inspect, seize, and demand information, with criminal exposure for obstruction.

Kenya is commercially attractive, but its environment is not for easy money. The upside exists, yet the model imposes heavy compliance costs and tax friction on operators.
Public reporting shows that the government expects significant revenue from gambling-related levies and treats the sector as a meaningful contributor to the budget. Kenya’s state media has reported multi-billion-shilling annual gaming tax targets and collections over recent years.
The Finance Act 2025 changes were also framed to widen the fee base through wallet-flow collection (deposit and withdrawal taxation), with projections of a strong revenue jump discussed in industry coverage.
At the same time, operators should expect the blunt truth:
If you want a jurisdiction where compliance is just a background, Kenya is the wrong choice. If you are eager to enter a market with explicit, enforceable regulation, this destination with new rules is what to investigate.
The jurisdiction is a strict iGaming destination with a modernised legal base and a regulator designed for monitoring. Operators who plan to work openly must treat compliance as part of the product.
Key aspects of licensing in Kenya:
If you plan to enter Kenya with a compliant online casino or sportsbook, 2WinPower can support the licensing pathway, the technical stack, and the operational setup needed to run without regulatory surprises.
Please be careful! We have noticed that scammers are using our contact details to deceive customers.
For security reasons, please use only the contact information provided on the page https://2wpower.com/en/feedback
Our company is not responsible for the actions of fraudsters.